Making Science Real

......Teaching and learning science in the real world

The Scientific Method and the Dollar Tree

You log into Facebook, and there’s THAT friend, the grammar expert.  You know, that well-meaning grammar cop who is on a personal mission to correct every grammar or spelling error, ever.  The friend who would bring together the programmers who created Autocorrect for a workshop.  We accept that person. We love that person, and sometimes we learn from that person.  Some of us may or may not recognize ourselves in that person.

I am not that person. Oh, no. I have a far more nerdy mission.

I went to Dollar Tree a few summers ago. I was decorating my classroom and wanted some of those huge colorful cutout letters that elementary teachers always have. I found the letters (I’ll post about that when it’s done, but I’m waiting for my school supply order to be filled to finish decorating). And, horrors! I found this, on an endcap.  (Apologies for the lousy photo. The aisle was kind of busy.)

The Scientific Method and The Dollar Tree

No. Just no.  When did we start teaching the “scientific method” to students? I think I remember learning it in maybe 8th grade, decades and decades ago. My subsequent years in research labs, however,  can verify that there is no one “scientific method.” 

What, then, should you teach students to do, for starters?

This. Data can be collected by students or can come from many sources. Students can analyze and write about the results using a straightforward method known as Claim-Evidence-Reasoning, or C-E-R. 

Here’s how that looks as students carry out and analyze an investigation:

  1.  Students ask a question. The question is phrased so the answers are not Yes or No. The answer to this question,  after data are collected, will become the CLAIM.
  2.  If students are to write an introduction or learn about the phenomenon they will investigate, they can examine some literature to get a background, and write about what they’ve learned.
  3. If students are designing the investigation, they next develop a procedure to test the question. Be sure there is only ONE independent variable (the condition the students will change) and all other variables (conditions) are controlled (not changed,)
  4. Students then carry out the investigation, collecting and recording detailed data. Measurements, colors, observations – not just yes, no, or checkmarks. These data will become their EVIDENCE.
  5. The data likely will need to be organized into a chart, graph, or some other visual to find trends and become EVIDENCE.  
  6. Based on the findings when organizing the data as evidence, students write  CLAIM – the answer to the question, The answer should be a short, sweet, summary of what students learned from their data. Example: Plants grow taller and have more leaves in warmer temperatures.
  7.  Then, students will write about the EVIDENCE. They should NOT write “see the data table.” This is a summary of the data. An example description of data showing that plants grow taller and have more leaves when grown in warmer temperatures might be “Plants in 30 degree C temperatures grew an average of 5 cm taller than plants in a 22 degree C classroom.”
  8. The REASONING brings together what students learned about plant growth Use what they learned in reading and writing about the background for the experiment to explain how the evidence supports the claim. 
Once students get the hang of answering their experimental question with a claim, citing the evidence to support the claim, and using their understandings of the science concepts involved to explain the reasoning why their evidence supports their claim, you can teach them to expand their conclusion. 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe for teaching tips, strategies, freebies, and updates!

Subscribe for teaching tips, strategies, freebies, and updates!